Back to Blog
Blog

How Corporate Legal Teams Use Generative AI to Serve Business Colleagues

October 24, 2024

How Corporate Legal Teams Use Generative AI to Serve Business Colleagues
Coheso

Coheso Team

6 min read

With all the talk of generative AI and digital transformation, you'd think corporate legal teams everywhere have efficient, technology-driven processes in place. The reality is quite the opposite.

Most corporate legal teams have limited technology—if any—and struggle to get budget approval for digital tools. Yet departments that do adopt technology consistently report considerable efficiency gains in short order.

A common question we encounter from corporate legal departments who want to leverage AI is: "Where do we start?" In our experience, the answer is an AI-driven centralized intake platform.

Do any of these resonate with how legal operations run in your organization?

Relying on Manual Processes

Business users seek help from legal for various tasks: answering questions, drafting documents, reviewing contracts. Instructions come in via:

  • Email
  • Slack or MS Teams
  • Phone calls
  • In-person meetings

Without centralized systems, legal teams work on these instructions manually:

  • Document drafting relies on searching local drives for similar past work
  • Document review means reading through each paragraph individually
  • Policy questions require hunting for the latest version across multiple locations
  • Missing information triggers back-and-forth emails or numerous phone calls
  • Request tracking becomes increasingly problematic when team members are out or leave

These manual processes create inefficiencies, slower turnaround times, and prevent the legal team from focusing on higher-value strategic work.

Allocating Resources Inefficiently

In many organizations, legal is seen as a cost center rather than a strategic partner. General counsels face budget cuts year over year and are expected to do more with less.

When requests arrive, someone must manually review each one and decide who should handle it. This leads to:

  • Arbitrary assignment — Work goes to the least busy lawyer rather than the most qualified
  • Round-robin allocation — Tasks assigned based on availability, not expertise
  • No workload visibility — Difficult to see who's overloaded and who's underutilized
  • Burnout risk — Overworked lawyers impact the entire team
  • Skill mismatch — A US commercial contracts lawyer reviewing GDPR agreements wastes time and produces subpar results

Poor work allocation leads to bottlenecks, missed deadlines, higher error rates, and job dissatisfaction.

Communication Gaps with Business Users

Without a digital intake platform, legal teams rely on informal, unstructured communication. When additional information is needed, the process becomes even more flawed—key details get missed or instructions get misinterpreted.

Business colleagues have little insight into:

  • The progress of their request
  • When they can expect a response
  • Who on the legal team is handling their matter

This causes stakeholders to repeatedly chase legal for updates, which further hinders the team's ability to complete the work. The result: delayed work, longer response times, and frustration on both sides.

Lacking Data-Driven Insights

Without a centralized intake platform, legal teams have limited visibility into:

  • Volume of incoming work
  • Types of requests
  • Status of matters at any given time
  • User satisfaction and turnaround times

This makes it difficult to quantify the value legal provides or justify requests for additional budget. Without analytics, teams can't anticipate workload fluctuations—like the influx of sales agreements at quarter-end—and adjust resources accordingly.

Like every other department, legal is expected to produce quarterly reports on work undertaken, work in progress, and value delivered. Without automation, collating this data requires considerable manual effort that pulls lawyers away from actual legal work.

Implementing a centralized legal intake platform boosts efficiency, manages risk, and improves legal service delivery. Here's how generative AI-powered platforms enhance workflow management.

Centralized Request Management

AI combines various existing channels into one centralized interface. Business colleagues access the system directly from their preferred tools—Microsoft Outlook or Slack—without navigating elsewhere.

Once a request is submitted, it enters the centralized intake system where it's triaged and assigned to the appropriate team member. Legal uses the AI-driven tool to:

  • Capture request details
  • Communicate with requesters
  • Track status of each matter

All within the same platform.

Dynamic Triage System

Generative AI streamlines request categorization, allowing teams to assign tasks based on urgency and expertise. AI algorithms analyze incoming requests to determine:

  • Subject matter — CCPA and GDPR questions route to Compliance and Data Privacy
  • Priority level — Claims against the organization get prioritized over general inquiries
  • Expertise required — Complex matters reach specialists, routine questions get handled efficiently

By categorizing incoming requests intelligently, legal departments manage workloads more effectively and ensure prompt responses to time-sensitive matters.

Real-Time Monitoring

AI-powered workflow management provides updates on every request. Legal teams monitor progress through dashboards displaying:

  • Requests over time
  • Pending tasks
  • Overall workload distribution

Business users can also query the system to find out who's handling their request, the current status, and expected response time. This structured intake process tracks metrics that highlight which processes need refinement.

Enhanced Interaction

Generative AI tools enhance interactions with business users by offering immediate assistance. AI-powered chatbots deployed on internal platforms like Slack allow business users to:

  • Self-serve — Access corporate information anytime
  • Get instant answers — FAQs addressed without waiting for a lawyer
  • Complete intake smoothly — Customizable forms capture all necessary details upfront

This cuts turnaround times because legal has all pertinent information to start working immediately. The system keeps users updated on status and asks for additional information when needed.

In-house legal departments without centralized intake tools rely on manual processes that diminish efficiency, elevate error risk, and escalate costs.

An AI-driven centralized platform—a legal front door—matches requests to team members' specialized knowledge and real-time capacity. The result: greater efficiency, increased job satisfaction, and improved work quality.

AI chatbots that address FAQs based on organizational policies remove low-value tasks from lawyers' desks. Business users benefit from faster response times and the ability to self-serve instead of waiting for legal to address their inquiries.

A robust legal intake platform is crucial for the modern corporate legal department. It improves collaboration, resource allocation, efficiency, data insights, and accountability—creating a more effective legal function aligned with organizational goals.

Want to see how Coheso can help your legal team?

Request a demo